Difference between revisions of "Genome"
m (→Contents) |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Introductory reading== | ==Introductory reading== | ||
<section begin=reading /> | <section begin=reading /> | ||
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 23128226}} |
− | |||
− | |||
<section end=reading /> | <section end=reading /> | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
**{{WP|Genome Reference Consortium}} | **{{WP|Genome Reference Consortium}} | ||
**{{WP|1000 Genomes Project}} | **{{WP|1000 Genomes Project}} | ||
+ | **$1000 Genome: [http://www.lifetechnologies.com/ Life technologies'] Ion Torrent and [http://www.illumina.com/ Illumina's] HiSeq | ||
* Genome annotation | * Genome annotation | ||
* Genome browsers working with genome-scale information | * Genome browsers working with genome-scale information | ||
Line 38: | Line 37: | ||
==Exercises== | ==Exercises== | ||
<section begin=exercises /> | <section begin=exercises /> | ||
− | {{#pmid:19378150}} | + | {{#pmid: 19378150}} |
<section end=exercises /> | <section end=exercises /> | ||
Line 51: | Line 50: | ||
| | ||
==Further reading and resources== | ==Further reading and resources== | ||
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 24297252}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 23598338}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 22965149}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 22764121}} |
− | {{#pmid:20221925}} | + | {{#pmid: 22271477}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 21962520}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 21925324}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 21720365}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 21627854}} |
− | {{#pmid: | + | {{#pmid: 21307931}} |
+ | {{#pmid: 20948549}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 20835789}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 20827601}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 20519285}}<!-- Comment: Open source software --> | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 20221925}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 19855104}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 19617911}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 18262676}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 17993665}} | ||
+ | {{#pmid: 15343339}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;Sites: | ||
+ | <div class="reference-box">[http://www.personalgenomes.ca/ '''Personal Genome Project'''] <small>Canada Node @ SickKids</small><br/>See also:{{#pmid:24108012}}</div> | ||
+ | <div class="reference-box">[http://www.genomesonline.org/ '''GOLD''' (Genomes Online Database''']</div> | ||
+ | <div class="reference-box">[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome '''NCBI Genome''']</div> | ||
+ | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
{{WWW|WWW_ }} | {{WWW|WWW_ }} |
Latest revision as of 20:35, 14 January 2014
Genome
Genome sequencing brought the first complete description of the cell's components to light. It is a topic of ever increasing prominence with the advent of technologies that can sequence entire eukaryotic genomes in less than a week at a cost of less than a thousand dollars. Besides assembly and maintenance of such large amounts of data, data interpretation via automated annotation algorithms, and data access through tools such as genome browsers are active topics.
Introductory reading
Abecasis et al. (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491:56-65. (pmid: 23128226) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] By characterizing the geographic and functional spectrum of human genetic variation, the 1000 Genomes Project aims to build a resource to help to understand the genetic contribution to disease. Here we describe the genomes of 1,092 individuals from 14 populations, constructed using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome and exome sequencing. By developing methods to integrate information across several algorithms and diverse data sources, we provide a validated haplotype map of 38 million single nucleotide polymorphisms, 1.4 million short insertions and deletions, and more than 14,000 larger deletions. We show that individuals from different populations carry different profiles of rare and common variants, and that low-frequency variants show substantial geographic differentiation, which is further increased by the action of purifying selection. We show that evolutionary conservation and coding consequence are key determinants of the strength of purifying selection, that rare-variant load varies substantially across biological pathways, and that each individual contains hundreds of rare non-coding variants at conserved sites, such as motif-disrupting changes in transcription-factor-binding sites. This resource, which captures up to 98% of accessible single nucleotide polymorphisms at a frequency of 1% in related populations, enables analysis of common and low-frequency variants in individuals from diverse, including admixed, populations. |
Contents
- Genome sequencing and assembly
- Human - current: GRCh37 (2009). With the next iteration, genome coordinates will change (again)
- Reference genome
- Genome Reference Consortium
- 1000 Genomes Project
- $1000 Genome: Life technologies' Ion Torrent and Illumina's HiSeq
- Genome annotation
- Genome browsers working with genome-scale information
- Programmatic access to genome sequences
Exercises
Pevsner (2009) Analysis of genomic DNA with the UCSC genome browser. Methods Mol Biol 537:277-301. (pmid: 19378150) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Genomic DNA is being sequenced and annotated at a rapid rate, with terabases of DNA currently deposited in GenBank and other repositories. Genome browsers provide an essential collection of resources to visualize and analyze chromosomal DNA. The University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC) Genome Browser provides annotations from the level of single nucleotides to whole chromosomes for four dozen metazoan and other species. The Genome Browser may be used to address a wide range of problems in bioinformatics (e.g., sequence analysis), comparative genomics, and evolution. |
Further reading and resources
Powell et al. (2014) eggNOG v4.0: nested orthology inference across 3686 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D231-9. (pmid: 24297252) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] With the increasing availability of various 'omics data, high-quality orthology assignment is crucial for evolutionary and functional genomics studies. We here present the fourth version of the eggNOG database (available at http://eggnog.embl.de) that derives nonsupervised orthologous groups (NOGs) from complete genomes, and then applies a comprehensive characterization and analysis pipeline to the resulting gene families. Compared with the previous version, we have more than tripled the underlying species set to cover 3686 organisms, keeping track with genome project completions while prioritizing the inclusion of high-quality genomes to minimize error propagation from incomplete proteome sets. Major technological advances include (i) a robust and scalable procedure for the identification and inclusion of high-quality genomes, (ii) provision of orthologous groups for 107 different taxonomic levels compared with 41 in eggNOGv3, (iii) identification and annotation of particularly closely related orthologous groups, facilitating analysis of related gene families, (iv) improvements of the clustering and functional annotation approach, (v) adoption of a revised tree building procedure based on the multiple alignments generated during the process and (vi) implementation of quality control procedures throughout the entire pipeline. As in previous versions, eggNOGv4 provides multiple sequence alignments and maximum-likelihood trees, as well as broad functional annotation. Users can access the complete database of orthologous groups via a web interface, as well as through bulk download. |
Amemiya et al. (2013) The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496:311-6. (pmid: 23598338) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] The discovery of a living coelacanth specimen in 1938 was remarkable, as this lineage of lobe-finned fish was thought to have become extinct 70 million years ago. The modern coelacanth looks remarkably similar to many of its ancient relatives, and its evolutionary proximity to our own fish ancestors provides a glimpse of the fish that first walked on land. Here we report the genome sequence of the African coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. Through a phylogenomic analysis, we conclude that the lungfish, and not the coelacanth, is the closest living relative of tetrapods. Coelacanth protein-coding genes are significantly more slowly evolving than those of tetrapods, unlike other genomic features. Analyses of changes in genes and regulatory elements during the vertebrate adaptation to land highlight genes involved in immunity, nitrogen excretion and the development of fins, tail, ear, eye, brain and olfaction. Functional assays of enhancers involved in the fin-to-limb transition and in the emergence of extra-embryonic tissues show the importance of the coelacanth genome as a blueprint for understanding tetrapod evolution. |
Collisson et al. (2012) What are we learning from the cancer genome?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9:621-30. (pmid: 22965149) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Massively parallel approaches to nucleic acid sequencing have matured from proof-of-concept to commercial products during the past 5 years. These technologies are now widely accessible, increasingly affordable, and have already exerted a transformative influence on the study of human cancer. Here, we review new features of cancer genomes that are being revealed by large-scale applications of these technologies. We focus on those insights most likely to affect future clinical practice. Foremost among these lessons, we summarize the formidable genetic heterogeneity within given cancer types that is appreciable with higher resolution profiling and larger sample sets. We discuss the inherent challenges of defining driving genomic events in a given cancer genome amidst thousands of other somatic events. Finally, we explore the organizational, regulatory and societal challenges impeding precision cancer medicine based on genomic profiling from assuming its place as standard-of-care. |
Wang et al. (2013) A brief introduction to web-based genome browsers. Brief Bioinformatics 14:131-43. (pmid: 22764121) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Genome browser provides a graphical interface for users to browse, search, retrieve and analyze genomic sequence and annotation data. Web-based genome browsers can be classified into general genome browsers with multiple species and species-specific genome browsers. In this review, we attempt to give an overview for the main functions and features of web-based genome browsers, covering data visualization, retrieval, analysis and customization. To give a brief introduction to the multiple-species genome browser, we describe the user interface and main functions of the Ensembl and UCSC genome browsers using the human alpha-globin gene cluster as an example. We further use the MSU and the Rice-Map genome browsers to show some special features of species-specific genome browser, taking a rice transcription factor gene OsSPL14 as an example. |
Tran et al. (2012) Cancer genomics: technology, discovery, and translation. J Clin Oncol 30:647-60. (pmid: 22271477) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] In recent years, the increasing awareness that somatic mutations and other genetic aberrations drive human malignancies has led us within reach of personalized cancer medicine (PCM). The implementation of PCM is based on the following premises: genetic aberrations exist in human malignancies; a subset of these aberrations drive oncogenesis and tumor biology; these aberrations are actionable (defined as having the potential to affect management recommendations based on diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive implications); and there are highly specific anticancer agents available that effectively modulate these targets. This article highlights the technology underlying cancer genomics and examines the early results of genome sequencing and the challenges met in the discovery of new genetic aberrations. Finally, drawing from experiences gained in a feasibility study of somatic mutation genotyping and targeted exome sequencing led by Princess Margaret Hospital-University Health Network and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, the processes, challenges, and issues involved in the translation of cancer genomics to the clinic are discussed. |
Kenny & Bustamante (2011) SnapShot: Human biomedical genomics. Cell 147:248-248.e1. (pmid: 21962520) |
Han et al. (2011) SnapShot: High-throughput sequencing applications. Cell 146:1044, 1044.e1-2. (pmid: 21925324) |
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2011) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474:609-15. (pmid: 21720365) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] A catalogue of molecular aberrations that cause ovarian cancer is critical for developing and deploying therapies that will improve patients' lives. The Cancer Genome Atlas project has analysed messenger RNA expression, microRNA expression, promoter methylation and DNA copy number in 489 high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinomas and the DNA sequences of exons from coding genes in 316 of these tumours. Here we report that high-grade serous ovarian cancer is characterized by TP53 mutations in almost all tumours (96%); low prevalence but statistically recurrent somatic mutations in nine further genes including NF1, BRCA1, BRCA2, RB1 and CDK12; 113 significant focal DNA copy number aberrations; and promoter methylation events involving 168 genes. Analyses delineated four ovarian cancer transcriptional subtypes, three microRNA subtypes, four promoter methylation subtypes and a transcriptional signature associated with survival duration, and shed new light on the impact that tumours with BRCA1/2 (BRCA1 or BRCA2) and CCNE1 aberrations have on survival. Pathway analyses suggested that homologous recombination is defective in about half of the tumours analysed, and that NOTCH and FOXM1 signalling are involved in serous ovarian cancer pathophysiology. |
Malone & Oliver (2011) Microarrays, deep sequencing and the true measure of the transcriptome. BMC Biol 9:34. (pmid: 21627854) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Microarrays first made the analysis of the transcriptome possible, and have produced much important information. Today, however, researchers are increasingly turning to direct high-throughput sequencing -- RNA-Seq -- which has considerable advantages for examining transcriptome fine structure -- for example in the detection of allele-specific expression and splice junctions. In this article, we discuss the relative merits of the two techniques, the inherent biases in each, and whether all of the vast body of array work needs to be revisited using the newer technology. We conclude that microarrays remain useful and accurate tools for measuring expression levels, and RNA-Seq complements and extends microarray measurements. |
Lander (2011) Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature 470:187-97. (pmid: 21307931) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] The sequence of the human genome has dramatically accelerated biomedical research. Here I explore its impact, in the decade since its publication, on our understanding of the biological functions encoded in the genome, on the biological basis of inherited diseases and cancer, and on the evolution and history of the human species. I also discuss the road ahead in fulfilling the promise of genomics for medicine. |
Petty (2010) Genome annotation: man versus machine. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:762. (pmid: 20948549) |
Nagarajan & Pop (2010) Sequencing and genome assembly using next-generation technologies. Methods Mol Biol 673:1-17. (pmid: 20835789) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Several sequencing technologies have been introduced in recent years that dramatically outperform the traditional Sanger technology in terms of throughput and cost. The data generated by these technologies are characterized by generally shorter read lengths (as low as 35 bp) and different error characteristics than Sanger data. Existing software tools for assembly and analysis of sequencing data are, therefore, ill-suited to handle the new types of data generated. This paper surveys the recent software packages aimed specifically at analyzing new generation sequencing data. |
Montgomery et al. (2010) Annotating the regulatory genome. Methods Mol Biol 674:313-49. (pmid: 20827601) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Determining the timing and molecular repertoire responsible for gene expression is fundamental to understanding a gene's function. Heritable differences in this character are increasingly regarded as explanatory for complex and common traits. For many known trait-predisposing genes, studies have sought to elucidate the associated logic behind gene regulation. However, there exist many challenges in deciphering these mechanisms. Among them, it is recognized that we have limited understanding of regulatory complexity, the current models of gene regulation have low specificity and any gene's regulatory logic is dependent on biological context. Addressing these limitations and defining the regulatory genome is an ongoing challenge for molecular biology. We discuss current efforts to define and annotate the regulatory genome by focusing on curation and text-mining activities. We further highlight the type of information and curation process for describing regulatory elements within the ORegAnno database ( www.oreganno.org ) and how the general standards for such information are changing. |
Kislyuk et al. (2010) A computational genomics pipeline for prokaryotic sequencing projects. Bioinformatics 26:1819-26. (pmid: 20519285) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] MOTIVATION: New sequencing technologies have accelerated research on prokaryotic genomes and have made genome sequencing operations outside major genome sequencing centers routine. However, no off-the-shelf solution exists for the combined assembly, gene prediction, genome annotation and data presentation necessary to interpret sequencing data. The resulting requirement to invest significant resources into custom informatics support for genome sequencing projects remains a major impediment to the accessibility of high-throughput sequence data. RESULTS: We present a self-contained, automated high-throughput open source genome sequencing and computational genomics pipeline suitable for prokaryotic sequencing projects. The pipeline has been used at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the analysis of Neisseria meningitidis and Bordetella bronchiseptica genomes. The pipeline is capable of enhanced or manually assisted reference-based assembly using multiple assemblers and modes; gene predictor combining; and functional annotation of genes and gene products. Because every component of the pipeline is executed on a local machine with no need to access resources over the Internet, the pipeline is suitable for projects of a sensitive nature. Annotation of virulence-related features makes the pipeline particularly useful for projects working with pathogenic prokaryotes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The pipeline is licensed under the open-source GNU General Public License and available at the Georgia Tech Neisseria Base (http://nbase.biology.gatech.edu/). The pipeline is implemented with a combination of Perl, Bourne Shell and MySQL and is compatible with Linux and other Unix systems. |
Picardi & Pesole (2010) Computational methods for ab initio and comparative gene finding. Methods Mol Biol 609:269-84. (pmid: 20221925) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] High-throughput DNA sequencing is increasing the amount of public complete genomes even though a precise gene catalogue for each organism is not yet available. In this context, computational gene finders play a key role in producing a first and cost-effective annotation. Nowadays a compilation of gene prediction tools has been made available to the scientific community and, despite the high number, they can be divided into two main categories: (1) ab initio and (2) evidence based. In the following, we will provide an overview of main methodologies to predict correct exon-intron structures of eukaryotic genes falling in such categories. We will take into account also new strategies that commonly refine ab initio predictions employing comparative genomics or other evidence such as expression data. Finally, we will briefly introduce metrics to in house evaluation of gene predictions in terms of sensitivity and specificity at nucleotide, exon, and gene levels as well. |
Yang et al. (2010) Annotation confidence score for genome annotation: a genome comparison approach. Bioinformatics 26:22-9. (pmid: 19855104) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] MOTIVATION: The massively parallel sequencing technology can be used by small research labs to generate genome sequences of their research interest. However, annotation of genomes still relies on the manual process, which becomes a serious bottleneck to the high-throughput genome projects. Recently, automatic annotation methods are increasingly more accurate, but there are several issues. One important challenge in using automatic annotation methods is to distinguish annotation quality of ORFs or genes. The availability of such annotation quality of genes can reduce the human labor cost dramatically since manual inspection can focus only on genes with low-annotation quality scores. RESULTS: In this article, we propose a novel annotation quality or confidence scoring scheme, called Annotation Confidence Score (ACS), using a genome comparison approach. The scoring scheme is computed by combining sequence and textual annotation similarity using a modified version of a logistic curve. The most important feature of the proposed scoring scheme is to generate a score that reflects the excellence in annotation quality of genes by automatically adjusting the number of genomes used to compute the score and their phylogenetic distance. Extensive experiments with bacterial genomes showed that the proposed scoring scheme generated scores for annotation quality according to the quality of annotation regardless of the number of reference genomes and their phylogenetic distance. AVAILABILITY: http://microbial.informatics.indiana.edu/acs |
Bakke et al. (2009) Evaluation of three automated genome annotations for Halorhabdus utahensis. PLoS ONE 4:e6291. (pmid: 19617911) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Genome annotations are accumulating rapidly and depend heavily on automated annotation systems. Many genome centers offer annotation systems but no one has compared their output in a systematic way to determine accuracy and inherent errors. Errors in the annotations are routinely deposited in databases such as NCBI and used to validate subsequent annotation errors. We submitted the genome sequence of halophilic archaeon Halorhabdus utahensis to be analyzed by three genome annotation services. We have examined the output from each service in a variety of ways in order to compare the methodology and effectiveness of the annotations, as well as to explore the genes, pathways, and physiology of the previously unannotated genome. The annotation services differ considerably in gene calls, features, and ease of use. We had to manually identify the origin of replication and the species-specific consensus ribosome-binding site. Additionally, we conducted laboratory experiments to test H. utahensis growth and enzyme activity. Current annotation practices need to improve in order to more accurately reflect a genome's biological potential. We make specific recommendations that could improve the quality of microbial annotation projects. |
Pop & Salzberg (2008) Bioinformatics challenges of new sequencing technology. Trends Genet 24:142-9. (pmid: 18262676) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] New DNA sequencing technologies can sequence up to one billion bases in a single day at low cost, putting large-scale sequencing within the reach of many scientists. Many researchers are forging ahead with projects to sequence a range of species using the new technologies. However, these new technologies produce read lengths as short as 35-40 nucleotides, posing challenges for genome assembly and annotation. Here we review the challenges and describe some of the bioinformatics systems that are being proposed to solve them. We specifically address issues arising from using these technologies in assembly projects, both de novo and for resequencing purposes, as well as efforts to improve genome annotation in the fragmented assemblies produced by short read lengths. |
Karolchik et al. (2007) Comparative genomic analysis using the UCSC genome browser. Methods Mol Biol 395:17-34. (pmid: 17993665) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] Comparative analysis of DNA sequence from multiple species can provide insights into the function and evolutionary processes that shape genomes. The University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) Genome Bioinformatics group has developed several tools and methodologies in its study of comparative genomics, many of which have been incorporated into the UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu), an easy-to-use online tool for browsing genomic data and aligned annotation "tracks" in a single window. The comparative genomics annotations in the browser include pairwise alignments, which aid in the identification of orthologous regions between species, and conservation tracks that show measures of evolutionary conservation among sets of multiply aligned species, highlighting regions of the genome that may be functionally important. A related tool, the UCSC Table Browser, provides a simple interface for querying, analyzing, and downloading the data underlying the Genome Browser annotation tracks. Here, we describe a procedure for examining a genomic region of interest in the Genome Browser, analyzing characteristics of the region, filtering the data, and downloading data sets for further study. |
Harbison et al. (2004) Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431:99-104. (pmid: 15343339) |
[ PubMed ] [ DOI ] DNA-binding transcriptional regulators interpret the genome's regulatory code by binding to specific sequences to induce or repress gene expression. Comparative genomics has recently been used to identify potential cis-regulatory sequences within the yeast genome on the basis of phylogenetic conservation, but this information alone does not reveal if or when transcriptional regulators occupy these binding sites. We have constructed an initial map of yeast's transcriptional regulatory code by identifying the sequence elements that are bound by regulators under various conditions and that are conserved among Saccharomyces species. The organization of regulatory elements in promoters and the environment-dependent use of these elements by regulators are discussed. We find that environment-specific use of regulatory elements predicts mechanistic models for the function of a large population of yeast's transcriptional regulators. |
- Sites
See also:
Church (2013) Improving genome understanding. Nature 502:143. (pmid: 24108012) |