Lecture 01

Update Warning! This page has not been revised yet for the 2007 Fall term. Some of the slides may be reused, but please consider the page as a whole out of date as long as this warning appears here.

(Next lecture)

Organisation and Orientation

Add/expand:

Mission: Analysis must be followed by interpretation, course is hands-on, interactive and goal oriented.
Technology: Google group, Wiki, supporting material on the Web
Contact information
Technical details of course organisation

Lecture Slides

Slide 001

Lecture 01, Slide 001
Bioinformatics is not only required to master the quantitative aspects of the post-genomic era in molecular biology, it is a qualitative change in our approach to biology as well.

Slide 002

Lecture 01, Slide 002
Bioinformatics can be viewed as the science that develops between the two poles of data management and computational modeling of life.

Slide 003

Lecture 01, Slide 003
From its beginning, it was recognized that molecular biology is an information science, just as much as a molecular science. The abstractions and models that focus on the essence of this information, rather than on the details of its representation, have proven to be remarkably powerful in explaining the basic features of life, such as inheritance, self-organization and the process of evolution.

Slide 004

Lecture 01, Slide 004
The promises of genome analysis include harnessing the power of self assembly towards a bio-nanotechnologic revolution: growth, rather than manufacturing. This includes the vision of regenerative molecular medicine, essentially relegating disease to the dark past ages of ignorance. But while the information for a complete specification of life is undoubtedly present in the genome, life realizes itself in complex interactions between context-dependent components. This makes life essentially unpredictable, at least to our current approaches. The sheer volume of data is a comparatively minor obstacle.

Slide 005

Lecture 01, Slide 005
The current emphasis on -omic sciences creates novel challenges both in the quantity as well as the quality of scientific enquiry. The scale has become larger; molecular components are analyzed not in isolation but in their associations;comparison between genes within and across species is a major source of new insight and the absence of particular components and features is just as informative as their presence. However the availability technology should not lead to a purely methods-driven agenda.

Slide 006

Lecture 01, Slide 006
The US National Center of Biotechnology Information is one of the world's major centres for molecular data.

Slide 007

Lecture 01, Slide 007
The PDB (Protein structure DataBase) is the world's central repository for 3D structural data of proteins and nucleic acids.

Slide 008

Lecture 01, Slide 008
KEGG (the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) is one of a group of data resources that focus on the functional relationships of the components of biological systems. Note that sequences, structures and functions are complementary aspects of the same molecular entities. Cross-referencing between databases and ensuring consistency is a major challenge and task of biological datat management.

Slide 009

Lecture 01, Slide 009
On one hand, we can conclude that biological data management is what bioinformatics is all about. On the other hand, bioinformatics as a science is a way to study biology. And this aspect - which I like to refer to as "Computational Biology" - is not well described by data management. It has a lot more to do with modeling, and the question of understanding biology.

Slide 010

Lecture 01, Slide 010

Slide 011

Lecture 01, Slide 011
Tying ties may be at first an intimidatingly imprecise task, and indeed irrelevant. (Half of North Americans are not eligible to wear a tie, even to formal occasions, and those of the other half who are not working in a bank will maybe wear a tie on only two occasions and have the tie tied for them on the second one. Tying ties is, alas, a cultural technique that appears to be on the decline.). But it is a nice example for abstracting a complicated process down to its essential principles, and reasoning formally about these principles to obtain rigorous results about the process.

Here is an example of a systematic, albeit informal description of the process of how to tie a tie. But why is the process divided into exactly these steps? Are all of them necessary? How do we describe this process so that we can remember it ? Or do we need to refer to the sequence of images every time we would like to tie this knot? Is this a simple, or a rather complicated way to tie a tie; are there others? Are there better ways to tie a tie, and what could better even mean?

Slide 012

Lecture 01, Slide 012
The triangular lattice walk transposes the problem from your neck into the domain of mathematics !

Slide 013

Lecture 01, Slide 013

Slide 014

Lecture 01, Slide 014
How many alternatives do we have to consider, if we allow maximally nine moves and require at least three for the finishing moves? We noted previously that there are two possibilities for the three finishing moves (LRC or RLC). Since moves cannot repeat into the same sector, each of the possibilities can only have been preceded by two alternatives i.e.. (CLRC or RLRC) and (CRLC or LRLC). These four possibilities again can have been preceded by two alternatives each ... etc. Since we treat knots of different move-numbers as distinct, the total number of moves up to length N is the sum of all powers of 2 up to (N-2). (-2 because of the finishing moves!). You should be able to figure out reasoning like this on your own!