Template choice principles

From "A B C"
Revision as of 15:56, 30 October 2007 by Boris (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The most important step of comparative modelling is a carefully done multiple sequence alignment of the target sequence with a protein of known structure. However, you can't expect a useful model either, if you use an unsuitable template and for many templates more than one coordinate file is available.

All homologues can contribute template information to your project!
How to find a template
  • Keyword searches
  • Sequence searches: BLAST and PSI-BAST
  • Use of CATH
Hard and easy results
  •  % sequence identity and RMSD: choose the most similar model
Assessing suitability
  • Orthology, paralogy
  • Complex
  • Function (inhibitor?)
  • Mutations (incl. His-tag, SeMet, post-translational modifications) - non adapted structural changes
  • order
  • Crystal packing
Assessing quality
  • Resolution, R-factor and coordinate error
  • R-free, R-merge ... but difficult to assess for the non-expert. Best: look at the map, but otherwise may need to check B-factors for sections of interest