FND-CSC-SPN
SPN
Structured Process Notation
(Structured Process Notation (SPN) for workflow modelling)
Abstract:
SPN (Structured Process Notation) is a lightweight, expressive notation for the design of dataflow diagrams.
Objectives:
|
Outcomes:
|
Deliverables:
Prerequisites:
This unit builds on material covered in the following prerequisite units:
Contents
Contents
Engineering workflow-centric software for research laboratories requires transparent, high level models to structure the design and to document the overall organisation of the code. However current methodologies are not well suited for this task, focussing on the implementation of objects rather than on the integration of functions and suffering from poor information design principles. SPN (Structured Process Notation) is an intuitive, lightweight alternative loosely based on SADT / IDEF0. SPN is intuitive by consistently applying a directional metaphor that is close to implementation, expressive by using icons and avoiding any superfluous elements, simple by minimizing the number of symbols and using explicit annotations, granular by supporting multiple levels of detail through nesting, and extensible.
The core SPN elements and their general layout. Icons are drawn on the left of the page, labels and descriptions on the right. Fonts may be formatted to emphasize correspondence. Input data enters an activity from the top, parameters from the left, database, libraries, services, repositories and similar resources from the right and output data leaves the activity at the bottom. Connections are drawn with black lines and all other lines in the diagram are not black to make them visually distinct. An activity can be annotated with functions, methods or algorithms. Notes and comments can be added for clarification, they are formatted in grey, the sense of their pointing arrows is always against the dataflow and these arrows are not connected to icons, to avoid confusion. A pale dotted line groups elements that are described in greater detail elsewhere, a reference is included. All elements of the diagram are optional. A Name identifies the process and a versioned reference ID (process prefix, number, version, page) provides a stable, traceableidentifier. The page number is optional for a single-page diagram. A summary at the top may be usefula nd help making the intent of the process explicit.
Features include:
- A structured, spatial organization of components intuitively depicts data flow.
- Information is not implicit in a complex grammar of symbols but made explicit; the set of symbols that are used is small and they are iconic, i.e. their shape is related to their semantics.
- SPN's process-centric view of data flow is close to the implementation of the workflow in code, in particular modules and interfaces are clearly visible.
- Icons are separated from text to allow uncluttered spatial representation of relationships, but explicit descriptions are available by placing elements and descriptions at corresponding heights on the diagram and relating them through mnemonic labels.
- Nesting of diagrams is encouraged. Procedures can be expanded into more detail in a separate diagram. This allows to structure all components of the workflow, at any level of granularity, without overloading individual diagrams with too much detail.
Elements
"Rules"
- I - Be clear and explicit
- This is "Rule Number One". As a corollary, any other rule or convention can be suspended if this helps the clarity of the diagram or improves the message.
- II - Name, reference, version
- A name for the process is listed on the top left of the diagram. A reference is on the top right, it is used in other documentation and to identify nested diagrams. A textual summary may appear at the top. Diagrams and references must be versioned.
- III - Begin and End states
- Abstract Begin and End states of a process are not normally drawn since they should be obvious from the context. An activity can be started with an input parameter or data element, and ends with an output data element.
- IV - Connecting arrows
- Connecting arrows are drawn as horizontal/vertical lines, never oblique lines. Crossing lines are avoided if possible. Arrows should not move against the dataflow.
- V -Multiple data items, multiple resources
- If multiple data elements are produced as output or used as input, they are connected to their respective source or target element with distinct lines, unless there are more than three. If there are more than three connections, they are merged into a connector element which is attached to an activity through a single line.
- If multiple instances of syntactically and semantically equivalent data items are produced, this is indicated with a multi data icon. These are connected to the activity that produces them with a single line.
- If the multiple elements are connected to an activity, this indicates that are processed sequentially. Parallel processing is indicated through braces.
- If the multiple elements are merged in an activity, this is indicated with a brace.
- VI - Nesting
- A procedure can be detailed at higher resolution on a separate sheet. All input and output must be shown at the parent level. This ensures that the expanded view of a procedure introduces no reference to streams or processes that were not present in the parent view and thus ensures that descriptions are locally complete. Nested diagrams are indicated with a box and annotated with a reference/version. The containing page is referenced like a continuation diagram.
- VII - Continuation
- If a process needs to be split accross several pages or diagrams, all output data items have connecting arrows that end at the bottom of the page on a pale, dotted line, and their icons are repeated at the top of the next page. The continuing page is referenced.
- VIII - Color
- All elements that are part of the process are drawn with black lines, all elements that provide additional structure or annotation are drawn grey or in a pale colour. Icons may be filled with a light colour to visually offset them clearly from the page background. Coloured fills may be used to visually group functionally related elements.
In Practice
I start drawing sketches by hand on a blackboard, or whiteboard to get a first overview and quickly move things around, reconnect and rearrange. A final, handdrawn sketch is fine, if an electronic diagram is required, I find after experimenting with many alternatives that Google Slides is currently the best tool to develop SPN diagrams. Here is a link to a SPN template that you can copy and use for your own diagrams.
Best Practice in SPN Diagrams | |
Labels | |
Good |
|
Bad |
|
Worst |
|
Connectors | |
Good |
|
Bad |
|
Worst |
|
Color | |
Good |
|
Bad |
|
Worst |
|
Even Worse than Worst |
|
Example
A sample process. Note that FETCH generates multiple files, PRY/MEND and TELL operate on these files sequentially. The files are merged by COUNT, which produces a single output list. Two nested diagrams for TELL and COUNT are referenced, there is no off-page continuation, the process terminates with FRA.
Self-evaluation
Notes
Further reading, links and resources
- A template of SPN icons and sample workflows using Google Slides
- Wikipedia article on SADT
- Wikipedia article on IDEF0 IDEF0, a successor to SADT.
If in doubt, ask! If anything about this learning unit is not clear to you, do not proceed blindly but ask for clarification. Post your question on the course mailing list: others are likely to have similar problems. Or send an email to your instructor.
About ...
Author:
- Boris Steipe <boris.steipe@utoronto.ca>
Created:
- 2017-08-05
Modified:
- 2017-10-05
Version:
- 1.0
Version history:
- 1.0 First live version
- 0.1 First stub
This copyrighted material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Follow the link to learn more.