Difference between revisions of "CSB modelling methods"

From "A B C"
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<div id="CSB"> <div class="b1"> Modelling Methods in Computational Biology </div> {{dev}} Intuitively we might think of pathway-, network-, and systems modelling simply as...")
 
m
Line 8: Line 8:
  
  
Intuitively we might think of pathway-, network-, and systems modelling simply as ever more sophisticated systems of coupled differential equations. That is the way it has been done for pathway modelling in biochemistry for decades. However, on a cellular level, matters are more difficult: we simply don't have the precise concentrations and rates available that we would need to populate such models. Important alternative (or complementary) approaches focus on the constraints that are inherent to the real world, such as mass- and energy- balance, or push the boundaries of simpler descriptions, down to purely topological approaches that can be populated in principle from interaction networks.
+
Intuitively we might think of pathway-, network-, and systems modelling simply to be ever more sophisticated applications of coupled differential equations. That is how it has been done for pathway modelling in biochemistry for decades. However, on a cellular level, matters are more difficult: we simply don't have the precise concentrations and rates available that we would need to populate such models. Important alternative (or complementary) approaches focus on the constraints that are inherent to the real world, such as mass- and energy- balance, or push the boundaries of simpler descriptions, down to purely topological approaches that can be populated in principle from interaction networks.
  
  
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
  
<!--
 
 
==Introductory reading==
 
==Introductory reading==
 
<section begin=reading />
 
<section begin=reading />
 +
{{#pmid:20448808}}  <!-- intro. reading -->
 
<section end=reading />
 
<section end=reading />
  
  
 +
&nbsp;
 
==Contents==
 
==Contents==
  
* ODEs, PDEs and their stochastic counterparts
 
* Constraint based modelling, Flux balance analysis
 
* Petri Nets
 
* Cellular Automata
 
* process calculi (pi-calculus)
 
  
 +
&nbsp;
 +
===ODEs, PDEs and their stochastic counterparts===
 +
{{#pmid:20835806}}
 +
{{#pmid:20836022}}
 +
{{#pmid:20836037}}
 +
{{#pmid:21766466}}
 +
<div class="reference-box">The {{WP|Gillespie algorithm}} for stochastic simulation.</div>
  
 +
 +
 +
&nbsp;
 +
===Constraint based modelling, Flux balance analysis===
 +
{{#pmid:17406635}}
 +
{{#pmid:19399432}}
 +
{{#pmid:21943910}}
 +
{{#pmid:21943915}}
 +
{{#pmid:22144164}}
 +
 +
 +
&nbsp;
 +
===Logical models===
 +
{{#pmid:20225868}}
 +
{{#pmid:22144167}}
 +
{{#pmid:21863503}}
 +
{{#pmid:21938638}}
 +
 +
 +
&nbsp;
 +
===Petri Nets===
 +
...
 +
 +
&nbsp;
 +
===Cellular Automata===
 +
...
 +
 +
&nbsp;
 +
===Process calculi (pi-calculus)===
 +
{{#pmid: 11262964}}
 +
 +
 +
&nbsp;
 +
===Agent-based models===
 +
...
 +
 +
 +
&nbsp;
 
==Exercises==
 
==Exercises==
 
<section begin=exercises />
 
<section begin=exercises />
 +
{{#pmid:22144165}}  <!-- exercises -->
 
<section end=exercises />
 
<section end=exercises />
  
  
 +
<!--
 +
&nbsp;
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references />
 
<references />
Line 38: Line 82:
  
 
-->
 
-->
 +
&nbsp;
 
==Further reading and resources==
 
==Further reading and resources==
 +
{{#pmid:22198700}}
 +
{{#pmid:22231096}}
 +
 +
 +
 
<!--
 
<!--
{{#pmid: }}
 
 
{{WWW|WWW_ }}
 
{{WWW|WWW_ }}
<div class="reference-box"></div>
 
 
-->
 
-->
  

Revision as of 23:28, 29 January 2012

Modelling Methods in Computational Biology


This page is a placeholder, or under current development; it is here principally to establish the logical framework of the site. The material on this page is correct, but incomplete.


Intuitively we might think of pathway-, network-, and systems modelling simply to be ever more sophisticated applications of coupled differential equations. That is how it has been done for pathway modelling in biochemistry for decades. However, on a cellular level, matters are more difficult: we simply don't have the precise concentrations and rates available that we would need to populate such models. Important alternative (or complementary) approaches focus on the constraints that are inherent to the real world, such as mass- and energy- balance, or push the boundaries of simpler descriptions, down to purely topological approaches that can be populated in principle from interaction networks.


Introductory reading

Meier-Schellersheim et al. (2009) Multiscale modeling for biologists. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 1:4-14. (pmid: 20448808)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]


 

Contents

 

ODEs, PDEs and their stochastic counterparts

Toni & Stumpf (2010) Parameter inference and model selection in signaling pathway models. Methods Mol Biol 673:283-95. (pmid: 20835806)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Hughey et al. (2010) Computational modeling of mammalian signaling networks. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2:194-209. (pmid: 20836022)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Ullah & Wolkenhauer (2010) Stochastic approaches in systems biology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2:385-397. (pmid: 20836037)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Neves (2012) Modeling of spatially-restricted intracellular signaling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 4:103-15. (pmid: 21766466)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

The Gillespie algorithm for stochastic simulation.


 

Constraint based modelling, Flux balance analysis

Becker et al. (2007) Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox. Nat Protoc 2:727-38. (pmid: 17406635)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Oberhardt et al. (2009) Flux balance analysis: interrogating genome-scale metabolic networks. Methods Mol Biol 500:61-80. (pmid: 19399432)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Schäuble et al. (2011) Hands-on metabolism analysis of complex biochemical networks using elementary flux modes. Meth Enzymol 500:437-56. (pmid: 21943910)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

van Eunen et al. (2011) Quantitative analysis of flux regulation through hierarchical regulation analysis. Meth Enzymol 500:571-95. (pmid: 21943915)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Behre et al. (2012) Detecting structural invariants in biological reaction networks. Methods Mol Biol 804:377-407. (pmid: 22144164)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]


 

Logical models

Morris et al. (2010) Logic-based models for the analysis of cell signaling networks. Biochemistry 49:3216-24. (pmid: 20225868)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Chaouiya et al. (2012) Logical modelling of gene regulatory networks with GINsim. Methods Mol Biol 804:463-79. (pmid: 22144167)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Whelan et al. (2011) Representation, simulation, and hypothesis generation in graph and logical models of biological networks. Methods Mol Biol 759:465-82. (pmid: 21863503)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Garg et al. (2012) Implicit methods for qualitative modeling of gene regulatory networks. Methods Mol Biol 786:397-443. (pmid: 21938638)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]


 

Petri Nets

...

 

Cellular Automata

...

 

Process calculi (pi-calculus)

Regev et al. (2001) Representation and simulation of biochemical processes using the pi-calculus process algebra. Pac Symp Biocomput 459-70. (pmid: 11262964)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]


 

Agent-based models

...


 

Exercises

Marwan et al. (2012) Petri nets in Snoopy: a unifying framework for the graphical display, computational modelling, and simulation of bacterial regulatory networks. Methods Mol Biol 804:409-37. (pmid: 22144165)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]


 

Further reading and resources

Kalhor et al. (2011) Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat Biotechnol 30:90-8. (pmid: 22198700)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Misteli (2012) Parallel genome universes. Nat Biotechnol 30:55-6. (pmid: 22231096)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]