Difference between revisions of "CSB modelling principles"

From "A B C"
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<div id="CSB"> <div class="b1"> Quantitative Systems Models: Principles </div> {{dev}} Developing predictive, '''quantitative systems models''' can be considered the holy ...")
 
m
Line 8: Line 8:
  
  
Developing predictive, '''quantitative systems models''' can be considered the holy grail of the field, yet it is a formidable challenge. Not only do we require that models are quantitatively correct, which is a difficult task given that our knowledge of kinetic parameters and time-varying concentrations is incomplete, we also need to integrate models over several spatial and temporal orders of magnitude, to capture input at the molecular level and output of phenotypes.
+
Developing predictive, '''quantitative systems models''' can be considered the holy grail of the field, yet it is a formidable challenge. Not only do we require that models are quantitatively correct, which is a difficult task given that our knowledge of kinetic parameters and time-varying concentrations is incomplete, we also need to integrate models over several spatial and temporal orders of magnitude - from molecular-scale reactions to organ- and organism-scale phenotypes.
  
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
Line 48: Line 48:
 
{{#pmid:19381532}}
 
{{#pmid:19381532}}
 
{{#pmid:20824468}}
 
{{#pmid:20824468}}
 +
{{#pmid:21762717}}
  
  

Revision as of 23:05, 29 January 2012

Quantitative Systems Models: Principles


This page is a placeholder, or under current development; it is here principally to establish the logical framework of the site. The material on this page is correct, but incomplete.


Developing predictive, quantitative systems models can be considered the holy grail of the field, yet it is a formidable challenge. Not only do we require that models are quantitatively correct, which is a difficult task given that our knowledge of kinetic parameters and time-varying concentrations is incomplete, we also need to integrate models over several spatial and temporal orders of magnitude - from molecular-scale reactions to organ- and organism-scale phenotypes.


 

Introductory reading

Tenazinha & Vinga (2011) A survey on methods for modeling and analyzing integrated biological networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 8:943-58. (pmid: 21116043)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Santos et al. (2011) A practical guide to genome-scale metabolic models and their analysis. Meth Enzymol 500:509-32. (pmid: 21943912)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]


 

Contents

  • Principles
  • Applications

   

Further reading and resources

Concepts
Takahashi et al. (2005) Space in systems biology of signaling pathways--towards intracellular molecular crowding in silico. FEBS Lett 579:1783-8. (pmid: 15763552)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Coveney & Fowler (2005) Modelling biological complexity: a physical scientist's perspective. J R Soc Interface 2:267-80. (pmid: 16849185)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Kestler et al. (2008) Network modeling of signal transduction: establishing the global view. Bioessays 30:1110-25. (pmid: 18937364)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Frazier et al. (2009) Computational representation of biological systems. Methods Mol Biol 541:535-49. (pmid: 19381532)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Vallabhajosyula & Raval (2010) Computational modeling in systems biology. Methods Mol Biol 662:97-120. (pmid: 20824468)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Bradley et al. (2011) OpenCMISS: a multi-physics & multi-scale computational infrastructure for the VPH/Physiome project. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 107:32-47. (pmid: 21762717)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]


Applications
Bhattacharya et al. (2010) Toward failure analyses in systems biology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2:507-517. (pmid: 20836044)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Kriete et al. (2011) Computational systems biology of aging. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 3:414-28. (pmid: 21197651)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]

Nookaew et al. (2011) Genome-scale metabolic models of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 759:445-63. (pmid: 21863502)

PubMed ] [ DOI ]