BIO Assignment 2 2011

Note! This assignment is currently inactive. Major and minor unannounced changes may be made at any time.

 
 

   

   

Assignment 2 - Search, retrieve and annotate

   

Preparation, submission and due date

Read carefully.

Be sure you have understood all parts of the assignment and cover all questions in your answers! Sadly, we always get assignments back in which important aspects have simply been overlooked and marks are unnecessarily lost. Sadly, we always get assignments back in which important aspects have simply been overlooked and marks are unnecessarily lost. If you did not notice that the above sentence was repeated, you are not reading carefully enough.

Review the guidelines for preparation and submission of BCH441 assignments.

The due date for the assignment is Thursday, October 9. at 10:00 in the morning.

   

Your documentation for the procedures you follow in this assignment will be worth 1 mark.

   

Introduction

Baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is perhaps the most important model organism. It is a eukaryote that has been studied genetically and biochemically in great detail for many decades, and it is easily manipulated with high-throughput experimental methods. We will use information from this model organism to study the conservation of function and sequence in other fungi whose genomes have been completely sequenced; the assignments are an exercise in model-organism reasoning: the transfer of knowledge from one, well-studied organism to others.

This and the following assignments will revolve around a transcription factor that plays an important role in the regulation of the cell cycle: Mbp1 is a key component of the MBF complex (Mbp1/Swi6). This complex regulates gene expression at the crucial G1/S-phase transition of the mitotic cell cycle and has been shown to bind to the regulatory regions of more than a hundred target genes.

One would speculate that such central control machinery would be conserved in other fungi and it will be your task in these assignments to collect evidence whether related molecular machinery is present in some of the newly sequenced fungal genomes. Throughout the assignments we will use freely available tools to conduct bioinformatics investigations of questions such as:

• What functional features can we detect in Mbp1?
• Do homologous proteins exist in other organisms?
• Do we believe these homologues may bind to similar sequence motifs?
• Do we believe they may function in a similar way?
• Do other organisms appear to have related cell-cycle control systems?

 

• Access the information page on Mbp1 at the Saccharomyces Genome Database and read the summary paragraph on the protein's function!

(If you would like to brush up on the concepts mentioned above, you could study the corresponding chapter in Lodish's Molecular Cell Biology. It is not strictly necessary to understand the details of the yeast cell-cycle to complete the assignments, but recommended, since it's obviously more fun to work with concepts that actually make some sense.)

In this particular assignment you will go on a search and retrieve mission for information on yeast Mbp1, using common public databases and Web resources.

Retrieve

 

 

Much useful information on yeast Mbp1 is compiled at the SGD information page on Mbp1. However we don't always have the luxury of such precompiled information. Let's look at the protein and it's features "the traditional way".

• Navigate to the NCBI homepage (you probably have bookmarked it anyway) and enter Mbp1 AND "saccharomyces cerevisiae"[organism] as an Entrez query.
• Click on Protein and find the RefSeq record for the protein sequence.
• From the NCBI RefSeq record, obtain a FASTA sequence of the protein and paste it into your assignment.

 

 

There are several sources for functional domain annotations of proteins. The NCBI has the Conserved Domain Database, in Europe, the SMART database provides such annotations. In terms of domains, both resources are very comparable. But SMART also analyses more general features such as low-complexity sequences and coiled coils. In order to use SMART however, we need the Uniprot accession number that corresponds to the refseq identifier. In a rational world, one would wish that such important crossreferences would simply be provided by the NCBI ... well, we have been wishing this for many years now. Fortunately ID-mapping services exist.

• Navigate to the UniProt ID-Mapping service. Enter the RefSeq identifier for the yeast Mbp1 protein and retrieve the corresponding UniProtKB Accession number.

 

 

Analyse

   

saccharomyces cerevisiae Mbp1 - domain annotations

Now we can analyse Mbp1's domain in SMART, and use this information to annotate the sequence in detail.

• Navigate to the SMART database, enter the yeast Mbp1 accession number and review the domain features of the protein.
• In your assignment, highlight the annotated features in the actual sequence by using the SMART annotations.

 

 

APSES domains

As you see from the annotations, Mbp1 is a large multidomain protein; it binds DNA through a small domain called the APSES domain and many organisms have more than one transcription factor that has a domain homologous to other APSES domains. Since we are interested in related proteins, and all functional relatives would be expected to share such a DNA binding domain, we should define this domain in more detail in order to be able to use it later to search for homologous proteins in each target organism.

 
Use the NCBI Entrez system to search for the string "apses" in the "Conserved Domains" database and access the entry for the APSES domain. You should find a number of aligned sequences on that page, each with their own GI identifier.

• Identify the two sequences that come from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (the Mbp1 and Swi4 APSES domains).
• Check whether the NCBI and the SMART definition of the APSES domain in Mbp1 coincide.
• Make sure you understand how the sequences displayed on the CDD page and the actual domain sequences differ. Hint: not all sequences are displayed in their full-length.

 

 

APSES domain structure

We can expect that the structures of all homologous APSES domains should be similar, i.e. if the structure of one is known, we should be able to conclude the approximate three-dimensional structure of any APSES domain. Indeed, structural information is available for APSES domains!

Identify and download the most appropriate coordinate file to study the structure, function and conservation of APSES domains from the PDB. Your choice could be based on:

• experimental method (X-ray or NMR)
• quality of the structure (resolution, refinement)
• size of the structure (number of animo acids for which structure has been determined)

 

• Record how you have identified the file, what criteria you have used to define whether it is better suited for analysis than others, and paste the HEADER, TITLE, COMPND and SOURCE records from the file into your assignment.

DNA binding site

The Mbp1 APSES domain has been shown to bind to DNA and the residues involved in DNA binding have been characterized. (Taylor et al. (2000) Biochemistry 39: 3943-3954 and Deleeuw et al. (2008) Biochemistry. 47:6378-6385) . In particular the residues between 50-74 have been proposed to comprise the DNA recognition domain.

 

Analysis (1 mark)

• Using VMD, generate a parallel stereo view of the protein structure that clearly shows the proposed Mbp1 DNA recognition domain, distinctly coloured differently from the rest of the protein. Use a representation that includes the sidechains.

• Generate a second VMD stereo image as above, but use a representation that emphasizes the secondary structure of the structure (tube or cartoon representation, colouring by structure).

• Generate a third VMD stereo image that shows three representations combined: (1) the backbone, (2) the sidechains of residues that presumably contact DNA, distinctly colored, and (3) a transparent surface of the entire protein. This image should show whether residues annotated as DNA binding form a contiguous binding interface.

Paste the images into your assignment in a compressed format. Briefly(!) summarize the VMD forms and parameters you have used.

DNA binding interfaces are expected to comprise a number of positively charged amino acids, that might form salt-bridges with the phosphate backbone.

 

Analysis (2 marks)

• Report whether this is the case here and which residues might be included.

• Do the DNA binding residues form a contiguous surface that is compatible with a binding interface? Justify your conclusions.

 

 

Onward: the Genome of Interest

Up to now, we have looked at the model-organism gene to obtain a baseline of information we are interested in. To move on, we need to access the genome of an organism we are interested in. In this course, the organism of interest is assigned to you.

The systematic name and strain of a fungus is listed with the project group that you have been assigned to. Navigate to the NCBI homepage → "Genomic Biology" → "Fungal Genomes Central" → "Genome Sequencing Projects". This should take you to a tabular view of ongoing and completed fungal genome sequencing projects. Find your organism name in this table. There may be one or more sequencing projects associated with the organism, but there should be only one project for the specific strain.

Click on the organism name to navigate to the Genome Project information page.

 

• Review the status of the data you are working with - such as
  • whether the entire genome is available or only a partial sequence;
  • How many chromosomes does this genome have?
  • What is the status of its genome assembly and annotation?
  • Has the mitochondrial genome been sequenced as well?
  • Why is this organism deemed important enough to be sequenced?

 

[End of assignment]

If you have any questions at all, don't hesitate to mail me at boris.steipe@utoronto.ca or post your question to the Course Mailing List