Difference between revisions of "User:Boris/BCB hackathon 2018"

From "A B C"
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 62: Line 62:
 
{{Smallvspace}}
 
{{Smallvspace}}
  
But we know so much more today. The '''number of sequenced genomes''' has exploded - selected individuals at first, then we envisioned the 1,000 genomes project (2008, completed 2012); quickly set our sights on 100,000 genomes (2012, almost completed), and as of today more than 500,000 human genomes have been sequenced overall. We have sequenced '''cancers''', and '''genetic diseases'''. We have sequenced representatives of virtually all '''ethnicities''' on the planet. We have even sequenced '''Neanderthals''' and Denisovians, and we have sequenced '''other species''' far and wide to acquire a sense of where we fit into the landscape of evolution. We have annotated the contents of the genome in the '''ENCODE''' project. We have built databases that carefully dissect all proteins into their domains, such as '''InterPro'''. We have started to outline how things work together in functional networks such as the '''STRING''' data, or in modules as published by '''KEGG''', and we are beginning to translate our insights into actionable information for medicine, at the '''OICR''', at Sick Kids' '''TCAG'''.
+
But we know so much more today. While the Celera map showed us the genome of one Caucasian male, the '''number of sequenced genomes''' has exploded - we envisioned the 1,000 genomes project (2008, completed 2012); quickly set our sights on 100,000 genomes (2012, almost completed), and as of today more than 500,000 human genomes have been sequenced overall. We have sequenced '''cancers''', and '''genetic diseases'''. We have sequenced representatives of virtually all '''ethnicities''' on the planet. We have even sequenced '''Neanderthals''' and Denisovians, and we have sequenced '''other species''' far and wide to acquire a sense of where we humans fit into the landscape of evolution. We have annotated the contents of the genome in the '''ENCODE''' project. We have built databases that carefully dissect all proteins into their domains, such as '''InterPro'''. We have started to outline how things work together in functional networks such as the '''STRING''' data, or in modules as published by '''KEGG''', and we are beginning to translate our insights into actionable information for medicine, at the '''OICR''', at Sick Kids' '''TCAG'''.
  
 
{{Smallvspace}}
 
{{Smallvspace}}
  
Our imagination of the genome has matured tremendously.  
+
Our imagination of the genome has matured tremendously. Let's come together for a catalytic task:
  
 
{{Smallvspace}}
 
{{Smallvspace}}
  
'''What is the image we will find for the Human Genome – 20 years on?'''  
+
'''Create the image that will define how we understand the Human Genome – 20 years on.'''  
  
  
Line 91: Line 91:
 
== Process ==
 
== Process ==
 
{{Smallvspace}}
 
{{Smallvspace}}
 +
 +
This is a two day hackathon for undergraduate student teams from any POSt, Faculty, or even University<ref>Teams can include up to one-in-five graduate students or BCB alumni.</ref>. So prepare yourselves:
 +
** Recent papers on sequenced genomes will make you familiar with the language and ideas in the field;
 +
** Have a look at the code snippets we've prepared to get some technicalities out of the way; request more if you can't find what you think you'll need;
 +
** Form teams: teams will need a mixed set of skills: writing clean, efficient code; statistics; algorithms; software engineering; understanding the biology; art and design;  planning, coordination and documentation; public presentation - you'll need to find people beyond BCB in CS, Stats, the humanities (philosophy would be useful), life sciences, medicine (for sure!), art (welcome to reach out to OCAD);
 +
** (logistics?)
 +
 +
 +
* We'll start the day off with a backgrounder on the genome, genome-scale data sources and examples of current analysis and visualization;
 +
* We'll do a special presentation on information design and user perspectives;
 +
* Then we'll design, code, and refine;
 +
* Mentors will be available for assistance;
 +
* We'll have ad hoc tutorials on common issues;
 +
* We'll supply sample code for common tasks;
 +
* And we'll have a round of judges' feedback on concepts;
 +
* Food. Yes, there will be food.
 +
* And coffee.
 +
* Because this will go all night (or until we're done).
 +
* Code-freeze in the morning: the teams will present their progress.
 +
* Judging will be done over lunch;
 +
* And we'll finish off with awards and prizes.
 +
 +
And finally we'll talk about where we'll go from there. Because there are perspectives.
  
  
Line 97: Line 120:
 
== Perspectives ==
 
== Perspectives ==
 
{{Smallvspace}}
 
{{Smallvspace}}
 +
We don't expect to come up with polished, comprehensive solutions. But we hope for a rich showcase of possibilities: our collective intelligence creates approaches that we could not possibly have thought of alone. We will take these results, and coordinate refinement and integration. Once we are satisfied, the "Genome Anniversary" will be close ...
 +
 +
;Let's think big.
 +
 +
* Make this a story for the Bulletin? The Star? Nature & Science?
 +
* With resources and sponsorship from the CS Department? Compute Ontario? Amazon? Google?
 +
* A poster in every biology department? In every school of Toronto? Canada? The Planet?
 +
* Under the patronage of UofT's research institutes? CIHR? UNESCO?
  
 +
It's up to you.
  
 
{{Vspace}}
 
{{Vspace}}

Latest revision as of 16:49, 8 February 2018

BCB Hackathon 2018

(Topic Proposal: The Human Genome - 20 years later)


 


Abstract:

This topic proposal for the 2018 BCB hackathon is to explore new ways to provide a holistic overview of the contents of the human genome, for the occasion of the 20th anniversary of its sequence.


 


 

Background

 

The first two draft sequences of the human genome were published in February of 2001[1][2]. Three years from now will mark the twentieth anniversary of this accomplishment that like now other has shaped the landscape of bioinformatics, computational biology and molecular medicine.


 

In 2001, Celera - a private company founded three years earlier to commercialize genome information - published an iconic poster summarizing their version of the genome. It is still fascinating today.

CeleraPoster.med.jpg

This poster is significant, not so much for its interpretable content, but for the unique perspective it gives us on the entirety of information that constitutes our molecular identity.

CeleraPosterTop.med.jpg

The details are rich, in fact, surprisingly "modern", presenting features like CpG islands and SNP density, and exon transcripts with Gene Ontology functional categories colour coded, for forward and reverse strand, accurately plotted on the nucleotide backbone at about 500 kB per centimetre. This was computed from gff records with Josep Abril's gff2ps software[3].

CeleraPosterChr4.med.jpg


 

But we know so much more today. While the Celera map showed us the genome of one Caucasian male, the number of sequenced genomes has exploded - we envisioned the 1,000 genomes project (2008, completed 2012); quickly set our sights on 100,000 genomes (2012, almost completed), and as of today more than 500,000 human genomes have been sequenced overall. We have sequenced cancers, and genetic diseases. We have sequenced representatives of virtually all ethnicities on the planet. We have even sequenced Neanderthals and Denisovians, and we have sequenced other species far and wide to acquire a sense of where we humans fit into the landscape of evolution. We have annotated the contents of the genome in the ENCODE project. We have built databases that carefully dissect all proteins into their domains, such as InterPro. We have started to outline how things work together in functional networks such as the STRING data, or in modules as published by KEGG, and we are beginning to translate our insights into actionable information for medicine, at the OICR, at Sick Kids' TCAG.


 

Our imagination of the genome has matured tremendously. Let's come together for a catalytic task:


 

Create the image that will define how we understand the Human Genome – 20 years on.


 

Goals

 

The goal of the hackathon contest is to define data-driven visualizations that broadly and intuitively represent key aspects of our current understanding of the human genome.

We will evaluate

  • creativity and innovation;
  • quality of information design;
  • biological relevance;
  • computational implementation; and
  • documentation and presentation.


 

Process

 

This is a two day hackathon for undergraduate student teams from any POSt, Faculty, or even University[4]. So prepare yourselves:

    • Recent papers on sequenced genomes will make you familiar with the language and ideas in the field;
    • Have a look at the code snippets we've prepared to get some technicalities out of the way; request more if you can't find what you think you'll need;
    • Form teams: teams will need a mixed set of skills: writing clean, efficient code; statistics; algorithms; software engineering; understanding the biology; art and design; planning, coordination and documentation; public presentation - you'll need to find people beyond BCB in CS, Stats, the humanities (philosophy would be useful), life sciences, medicine (for sure!), art (welcome to reach out to OCAD);
    • (logistics?)


  • We'll start the day off with a backgrounder on the genome, genome-scale data sources and examples of current analysis and visualization;
  • We'll do a special presentation on information design and user perspectives;
  • Then we'll design, code, and refine;
  • Mentors will be available for assistance;
  • We'll have ad hoc tutorials on common issues;
  • We'll supply sample code for common tasks;
  • And we'll have a round of judges' feedback on concepts;
  • Food. Yes, there will be food.
  • And coffee.
  • Because this will go all night (or until we're done).
  • Code-freeze in the morning: the teams will present their progress.
  • Judging will be done over lunch;
  • And we'll finish off with awards and prizes.

And finally we'll talk about where we'll go from there. Because there are perspectives.


 

Perspectives

 

We don't expect to come up with polished, comprehensive solutions. But we hope for a rich showcase of possibilities: our collective intelligence creates approaches that we could not possibly have thought of alone. We will take these results, and coordinate refinement and integration. Once we are satisfied, the "Genome Anniversary" will be close ...

Let's think big.
  • Make this a story for the Bulletin? The Star? Nature & Science?
  • With resources and sponsorship from the CS Department? Compute Ontario? Amazon? Google?
  • A poster in every biology department? In every school of Toronto? Canada? The Planet?
  • Under the patronage of UofT's research institutes? CIHR? UNESCO?

It's up to you.


 

Notes

 
  1. Lander et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921. (pmid: 11237011)

    PubMed ] [ DOI ] The human genome holds an extraordinary trove of information about human development, physiology, medicine and evolution. Here we report the results of an international collaboration to produce and make freely available a draft sequence of the human genome. We also present an initial analysis of the data, describing some of the insights that can be gleaned from the sequence.

  2. Venter et al. (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291:1304-51. (pmid: 11181995)

    PubMed ] [ DOI ] A 2.91-billion base pair (bp) consensus sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome was generated by the whole-genome shotgun sequencing method. The 14.8-billion bp DNA sequence was generated over 9 months from 27,271,853 high-quality sequence reads (5.11-fold coverage of the genome) from both ends of plasmid clones made from the DNA of five individuals. Two assembly strategies-a whole-genome assembly and a regional chromosome assembly-were used, each combining sequence data from Celera and the publicly funded genome effort. The public data were shredded into 550-bp segments to create a 2.9-fold coverage of those genome regions that had been sequenced, without including biases inherent in the cloning and assembly procedure used by the publicly funded group. This brought the effective coverage in the assemblies to eightfold, reducing the number and size of gaps in the final assembly over what would be obtained with 5.11-fold coverage. The two assembly strategies yielded very similar results that largely agree with independent mapping data. The assemblies effectively cover the euchromatic regions of the human chromosomes. More than 90% of the genome is in scaffold assemblies of 100,000 bp or more, and 25% of the genome is in scaffolds of 10 million bp or larger. Analysis of the genome sequence revealed 26,588 protein-encoding transcripts for which there was strong corroborating evidence and an additional approximately 12,000 computationally derived genes with mouse matches or other weak supporting evidence. Although gene-dense clusters are obvious, almost half the genes are dispersed in low G+C sequence separated by large tracts of apparently noncoding sequence. Only 1.1% of the genome is spanned by exons, whereas 24% is in introns, with 75% of the genome being intergenic DNA. Duplications of segmental blocks, ranging in size up to chromosomal lengths, are abundant throughout the genome and reveal a complex evolutionary history. Comparative genomic analysis indicates vertebrate expansions of genes associated with neuronal function, with tissue-specific developmental regulation, and with the hemostasis and immune systems. DNA sequence comparisons between the consensus sequence and publicly funded genome data provided locations of 2.1 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A random pair of human haploid genomes differed at a rate of 1 bp per 1250 on average, but there was marked heterogeneity in the level of polymorphism across the genome. Less than 1% of all SNPs resulted in variation in proteins, but the task of determining which SNPs have functional consequences remains an open challenge.

  3. Abril & Guigó (2000) gff2ps: visualizing genomic annotations. Bioinformatics 16:743-4. (pmid: 11099262)

    PubMed ] [ DOI ] gff2psis a program for visualizing annotations of genomic sequences. The program takes the annotated features on a genomic sequence in GFF format as input, and produces a visual output in PostScript. While it can be used in a very simple way, it also allows for a great degree of customization through a number of options and/or customization files.

  4. Teams can include up to one-in-five graduate students or BCB alumni.


 



About ...

 

Last update:

2017-02-06

Version:

1.0

Version history:

  • 1.0 First proposal


 


CreativeCommonsBy.png This copyrighted material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Follow the link to learn more.