Difference between revisions of "Homology modelling"

From "A B C"
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
 
{{#pmid: 22536966}}
 
{{#pmid: 22536966}}
 
{{#pmid: 22323219}}
 
{{#pmid: 22323219}}
 +
{{#pmid: 21465564}}
 
{{#pmid: 18075162}}
 
{{#pmid: 18075162}}
 
<div class="reference-box">[http://www.springerlink.com/content/978-1-61779-587-9/ Springer: Homology Modeling Methods and Protocols (2012)]</div>
 
<div class="reference-box">[http://www.springerlink.com/content/978-1-61779-587-9/ Springer: Homology Modeling Methods and Protocols (2012)]</div>

Revision as of 22:17, 15 November 2014

Homology modeling


This page is a placeholder, or under current development; it is here principally to establish the logical framework of the site. The material on this page is correct, but incomplete.


Summary ...



 

Contents

   

Further reading and resources

Bramucci et al. (2012) PyMod: sequence similarity searches, multiple sequence-structure alignments, and homology modeling within PyMOL. BMC Bioinformatics 13 Suppl 4:S2. (pmid: 22536966)

PubMed ] [ DOI ] BACKGROUND: In recent years, an exponential growing number of tools for protein sequence analysis, editing and modeling tasks have been put at the disposal of the scientific community. Despite the vast majority of these tools have been released as open source software, their deep learning curves often discourages even the most experienced users. RESULTS: A simple and intuitive interface, PyMod, between the popular molecular graphics system PyMOL and several other tools (i.e., [PSI-]BLAST, ClustalW, MUSCLE, CEalign and MODELLER) has been developed, to show how the integration of the individual steps required for homology modeling and sequence/structure analysis within the PyMOL framework can hugely simplify these tasks. Sequence similarity searches, multiple sequence and structural alignments generation and editing, and even the possibility to merge sequence and structure alignments have been implemented in PyMod, with the aim of creating a simple, yet powerful tool for sequence and structure analysis and building of homology models. CONCLUSIONS: PyMod represents a new tool for the analysis and the manipulation of protein sequences and structures. The ease of use, integration with many sequence retrieving and alignment tools and PyMOL, one of the most used molecular visualization system, are the key features of this tool.Source code, installation instructions, video tutorials and a user's guide are freely available at the URL http://schubert.bio.uniroma1.it/pymod/index.html.

Bordoli & Schwede (2012) Automated protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL Workspace and the Protein Model Portal. Methods Mol Biol 857:107-36. (pmid: 22323219)

PubMed ] [ DOI ] Comparative protein structure modeling is a computational approach to build three-dimensional structural models for proteins using experimental structures of related protein family members as templates. Regular blind assessments of modeling accuracy have demonstrated that comparative protein structure modeling is currently the most reliable technique to model protein structures. Homology models are often sufficiently accurate to substitute for experimental structures in a wide variety of applications. Since the usefulness of a model for specific application is determined by its accuracy, model quality estimation is an essential component of protein structure prediction. Comparative protein modeling has become a routine approach in many areas of life science research since fully automated modeling systems allow also nonexperts to build reliable models. In this chapter, we describe practical approaches for automated protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL Workspace and the Protein Model Portal.

Peng & Xu (2011) A multiple-template approach to protein threading. Proteins 79:1930-9. (pmid: 21465564)

PubMed ] [ DOI ] Most threading methods predict the structure of a protein using only a single template. Due to the increasing number of solved structures, a protein without solved structure is very likely to have more than one similar template structures. Therefore, a natural question to ask is if we can improve modeling accuracy using multiple templates. This article describes a new multiple-template threading method to answer this question. At the heart of this multiple-template threading method is a novel probabilistic-consistency algorithm that can accurately align a single protein sequence simultaneously to multiple templates. Experimental results indicate that our multiple-template method can improve pairwise sequence-template alignment accuracy and generate models with better quality than single-template models even if they are built from the best single templates (P-value <10(-6)) while many popular multiple sequence/structure alignment tools fail to do so. The underlying reason is that our probabilistic-consistency algorithm can generate accurate multiple sequence/template alignments. In another word, without an accurate multiple sequence/template alignment, the modeling accuracy cannot be improved by simply using multiple templates to increase alignment coverage. Blindly tested on the CASP9 targets with more than one good template structures, our method outperforms all other CASP9 servers except two (Zhang-Server and QUARK of the same group). Our probabilistic-consistency algorithm can possibly be extended to align multiple protein/RNA sequences and structures.

McGuffin (2008) Aligning sequences to structures. Methods Mol Biol 413:61-90. (pmid: 18075162)

PubMed ] [ DOI ] Most newly sequenced proteins are likely to adopt a similar structure to one which has already been experimentally determined. For this reason, the most successful approaches to protein structure prediction have been template-based methods. Such prediction methods attempt to identify and model the folds of unknown structures by aligning the target sequences to a set of representative template structures within a fold library. In this chapter, I discuss the development of template-based approaches to fold prediction, from the traditional techniques to the recent state-of-the-art methods. I also discuss the recent development of structural annotation databases, which contain models built by aligning the sequences from entire proteomes against known structures. Finally, I run through a practical step-by-step guide for aligning target sequences to known structures and contemplate the future direction of template-based structure prediction.