Difference between revisions of "Group project"

From "A B C"
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
Each group will take on one workflow to annotate. As a group, you will jointly define and structure the workflow. Individually, you will annotate some of the data items or procedures of the workflow. Your mark will be based on both components.  
 
Each group will take on one workflow to annotate. As a group, you will jointly define and structure the workflow. Individually, you will annotate some of the data items or procedures of the workflow. Your mark will be based on both components.  
  
Please be fair to your group members and alert me immediately in case you plan to drop the course.
 
  
 
<!-- For a limited time-period ...
 
<!-- For a limited time-period ...
 +
 
* You may change into open spots of other groups, if you request this by e-mail.
 
* You may change into open spots of other groups, if you request this by e-mail.
* You may swap groups, if both of you request this after class. -->
+
* You may swap groups, if both of you request this after class.
 +
 
 +
Please be fair to your group members and alert me immediately in case you plan to drop the course.-->
 +
 
 +
The project will proceed as follows:
 +
 
 +
#A number of topics from the general area of functional annotation are listed in the table below.
 +
#Jointly, as a group, choose one of the topics and one alternative (in case too many groups choose the same topic). If you would like to propose a different topic you are interested in, you may do so.
 +
#Discuss within your group your understanding of the topic, what databases and tools could be relevant and a proposed process - a sequence of steps - to address the topic. You may involve your TA into the discussion at any time.
 +
#Plan your time to be able to communicate about the project within the group, go through some improvements, and finish by the due date.
 +
#Summarize the results of the discussion (your plan how to go about this) in a paragraph of text, and e-mail it to your TA for feedback and iterated improvements.
 +
#Once the improvements are done, the following milestones should be achieved:
 +
##Task is broken down into a number of procedures
 +
##Each procedure has clearly defined input data, an algorithm operating on that data, and output data
 +
##There is a designated group member for each procedure
 +
##The entire process has been summarized in approximately one page, jointly written.
 +
#Individually, describe your designated procedure(s) in approximately one page. Define input data, algorithm, parameters, alternatives, output data etc. Give references. You may request feedback from TAs and from your group members and classmates. However you will take author's responsibility for the result.
 +
#Submit a collated hardcopy of the process summary and your individual procedure descriptions by the due date. Make sure your individual contributions are clearly identified with your name.
  
 +
;The due date is Thursday, December 4. (last day of class) at 6 p.m.
  
;Further details to be posted here.
+
<hr>
 +
;Topics:
 +
*Identify and contrast conserved regions on a gene vs. conserved regions on its expressed protein
 +
*Distinguish between structural and functional conservation ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12547207 1], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16644792 2], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16809388 3])
 +
*Predict domain boundaries ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17430200 1], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17430199 2])
 +
*Identify whether a gene of interest has been under recent positive selection ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18627454 1], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17473869 2])
 +
*Obtain a profile/profile alignment of distant homologues ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18247410 1], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16713709 2])
 +
*Identify whether a human gene of interest may be involved in a disease ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17638813 1] [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17493278 2])
 +
*Calculate a column-wise conservation score ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12112692 1], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17710364 2])
 +
*Predict membrane topology ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18075166 1])
 +
*Predict protein/protein interactions for a gene of interest ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18095187 1] [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18314580 2])
 +
*Identify and evaluate linear sequence motifs ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18508681 1], [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18460207 2])
 +
 
 +
(Some PubMed links are provided to get you started. Make use of the "Related Articles" feature in PubMed.)
 +
<hr>
  
  
Line 31: Line 63:
 
<td>'''Name'''</td>
 
<td>'''Name'''</td>
 
<td>'''Name'''</td>
 
<td>'''Name'''</td>
 +
<td>'''Name'''</td>
 +
<td>'''Topic'''</td>
 +
<td>'''TA'''</td>
 +
<td>'''Species'''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 41: Line 77:
 
<td>Zarnaben Shah</td>
 
<td>Zarnaben Shah</td>
 
<td>Herman Badwal</td>
 
<td>Herman Badwal</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Identify whether a human gene of interest may be involved in a disease</td>
 +
<td>Yaqi</td>
 +
<td>''Aspergillus fumigatus'' (Af293)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 49: Line 89:
 
<td>Yuanfan Yang</td>
 
<td>Yuanfan Yang</td>
 
<td>Marco Fiume</td>
 
<td>Marco Fiume</td>
 +
<td>Edwin Yip</td>
 +
<td>Use protein structural alignments for phylogenetic analysis</td>
 +
<td>Boris</td>
 +
<td>''Aspergillus nidulans'' (FGSC A4)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 57: Line 101:
 
<td>Marja Cemma</td>
 
<td>Marja Cemma</td>
 
<td>Isuru Wijesoma</td>
 
<td>Isuru Wijesoma</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Protein structure prediction</td>
 +
<td>Philip</td>
 +
<td>''Candida albicans'' (SC5314)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 65: Line 113:
 
<td>Ying Zhu</td>
 
<td>Ying Zhu</td>
 
<td>Alice Thach</td>
 
<td>Alice Thach</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Identify whether a human gene of interest may be involved in a disease</td>
 +
<td>Yaqi</td>
 +
<td>''Candida glabrata'' (CBS138)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 73: Line 125:
 
<td>Jason Yau</td>
 
<td>Jason Yau</td>
 
<td>Vincent Leung</td>
 
<td>Vincent Leung</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Distinguish between structural and functional conservation</td>
 +
<td>Philip</td>
 +
<td>''Coprinopsis cinerea'' (okayama 7#130)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 81: Line 137:
 
<td>Greg Clark</td>
 
<td>Greg Clark</td>
 
<td>Alexandr Bezginov</td>
 
<td>Alexandr Bezginov</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Predict protein/protein interactions for a gene of interest</td>
 +
<td>Ryder</td>
 +
<td>''Cryptococcus neoformans'' (var. neoformans JEC21)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 89: Line 149:
 
<td>Kiera Clayton</td>
 
<td>Kiera Clayton</td>
 
<td>Hang Shi</td>
 
<td>Hang Shi</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Predict protein/protein interactions for a gene of interest</td>
 +
<td>Philip</td>
 +
<td>''Debaryomyces hansenii'' (CBS 767)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 97: Line 161:
 
<td>Youssef Youssef</td>
 
<td>Youssef Youssef</td>
 
<td>Da Yu</td>
 
<td>Da Yu</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Distinguish between structural and functional conservation</td>
 +
<td>Yaqi</td>
 +
<td>''Giberella zeae'' (PH-1)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 102: Line 170:
 
<td>'''Lysine'''</td>
 
<td>'''Lysine'''</td>
 
<td>Wasan Abada</td>
 
<td>Wasan Abada</td>
<td>Chris Ting</td>
 
 
<td>Madhavi Patel</td>
 
<td>Madhavi Patel</td>
 
<td>Jing Huang</td>
 
<td>Jing Huang</td>
 +
<td>Shafa Chaudry</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Predict membrane topology</td>
 +
<td>Ryder</td>
 +
<td>''Kluyveromyces lactis'' (NRRL Y-1140)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 113: Line 185:
 
<td>YinYing Zhang</td>
 
<td>YinYing Zhang</td>
 
<td>Miao Yu</td>
 
<td>Miao Yu</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Predict membrane topology</td>
 +
<td>Ryder</td>
 +
<td>''Magnaporthe grisea'' (70-15)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
 
<tr class="s0">
 
<tr class="s0">
 
<td>'''Methionine'''</td>
 
<td>'''Methionine'''</td>
<td>Zhongyuan Zhang</td>
 
<td>Edwin Yip</td>
 
<td>Shafa Chaudry</td>
 
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>''Neurospora crassa'' (OR74-A)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 129: Line 209:
 
<td>Jiayi Hu</td>
 
<td>Jiayi Hu</td>
 
<td>Alex Ling</td>
 
<td>Alex Ling</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Identify whether a gene of interest has been under recent positive selection</td>
 +
<td>Yaqi</td>
 +
<td>''Pichia stipitis'' (CBS 6054)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 137: Line 221:
 
<td>Maryam Foumani</td>
 
<td>Maryam Foumani</td>
 
<td>Jennifer D'Cruz</td>
 
<td>Jennifer D'Cruz</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Distinguish between structural and functional conservation</td>
 +
<td>Philip</td>
 +
<td>''Schizosaccharomyces pombe'' (972h-)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 145: Line 233:
 
<td>Cecilia Chan</td>
 
<td>Cecilia Chan</td>
 
<td>Dilpreet Dhesi</td>
 
<td>Dilpreet Dhesi</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>Identify and contrast conserved regions on a gene vs. conserved regions on its expressed protein</td>
 +
<td>Ryder</td>
 +
<td>''Ustilago maydis'' (521)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 153: Line 245:
 
<td>Lakshmi Sugavaneswaran</td>
 
<td>Lakshmi Sugavaneswaran</td>
 
<td>Linda Zhao</td>
 
<td>Linda Zhao</td>
 +
<td>Zhongyuan Zhang</td>
 +
<td>Identify and contrast conserved regions on a gene vs. conserved regions on its expressed protein</td>
 +
<td>Boris</td>
 +
<td>''Yarrowia lipolytica'' (CLIB122)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 161: Line 257:
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>''&nbsp;''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 169: Line 269:
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>''&nbsp;''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 177: Line 281:
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>''&nbsp;''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 185: Line 293:
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>''&nbsp;''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
Line 193: Line 305:
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>&nbsp;</td>
 +
<td>''&nbsp;''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  
 
</table>
 
</table>

Latest revision as of 19:32, 20 November 2008

The Group Mini-Project

   

You have been assigned to groups of three or four students.

Each group will take on one workflow to annotate. As a group, you will jointly define and structure the workflow. Individually, you will annotate some of the data items or procedures of the workflow. Your mark will be based on both components.


The project will proceed as follows:

  1. A number of topics from the general area of functional annotation are listed in the table below.
  2. Jointly, as a group, choose one of the topics and one alternative (in case too many groups choose the same topic). If you would like to propose a different topic you are interested in, you may do so.
  3. Discuss within your group your understanding of the topic, what databases and tools could be relevant and a proposed process - a sequence of steps - to address the topic. You may involve your TA into the discussion at any time.
  4. Plan your time to be able to communicate about the project within the group, go through some improvements, and finish by the due date.
  5. Summarize the results of the discussion (your plan how to go about this) in a paragraph of text, and e-mail it to your TA for feedback and iterated improvements.
  6. Once the improvements are done, the following milestones should be achieved:
    1. Task is broken down into a number of procedures
    2. Each procedure has clearly defined input data, an algorithm operating on that data, and output data
    3. There is a designated group member for each procedure
    4. The entire process has been summarized in approximately one page, jointly written.
  7. Individually, describe your designated procedure(s) in approximately one page. Define input data, algorithm, parameters, alternatives, output data etc. Give references. You may request feedback from TAs and from your group members and classmates. However you will take author's responsibility for the result.
  8. Submit a collated hardcopy of the process summary and your individual procedure descriptions by the due date. Make sure your individual contributions are clearly identified with your name.
The due date is Thursday, December 4. (last day of class) at 6 p.m.

Topics
  • Identify and contrast conserved regions on a gene vs. conserved regions on its expressed protein
  • Distinguish between structural and functional conservation (1, 2, 3)
  • Predict domain boundaries (1, 2)
  • Identify whether a gene of interest has been under recent positive selection (1, 2)
  • Obtain a profile/profile alignment of distant homologues (1, 2)
  • Identify whether a human gene of interest may be involved in a disease (1 2)
  • Calculate a column-wise conservation score (1, 2)
  • Predict membrane topology (1)
  • Predict protein/protein interactions for a gene of interest (1 2)
  • Identify and evaluate linear sequence motifs (1, 2)

(Some PubMed links are provided to get you started. Make use of the "Related Articles" feature in PubMed.)



Groups

Group Name Name Name Name Name Topic TA Species
Alanine Maria Soloveychik Alison Muir Zarnaben Shah Herman Badwal   Identify whether a human gene of interest may be involved in a disease Yaqi Aspergillus fumigatus (Af293)
Cysteine Yuan Yao Adam Santoro Yuanfan Yang Marco Fiume Edwin Yip Use protein structural alignments for phylogenetic analysis Boris Aspergillus nidulans (FGSC A4)
Aspartate Nikko Torres Natalia Thawe Marja Cemma Isuru Wijesoma   Protein structure prediction Philip Candida albicans (SC5314)
Glutamate Joyce Lam Leo Wan Ying Zhu Alice Thach   Identify whether a human gene of interest may be involved in a disease Yaqi Candida glabrata (CBS138)
Phenylalanine Bell Ho Kris Hon Jason Yau Vincent Leung   Distinguish between structural and functional conservation Philip Coprinopsis cinerea (okayama 7#130)
Glycine Fan Zhang Fang Cai Greg Clark Alexandr Bezginov   Predict protein/protein interactions for a gene of interest Ryder Cryptococcus neoformans (var. neoformans JEC21)
Histidine Yi-an Chen Rachel Ford Kiera Clayton Hang Shi   Predict protein/protein interactions for a gene of interest Philip Debaryomyces hansenii (CBS 767)
Isoleucine Eric Wong Louis Barbier Youssef Youssef Da Yu   Distinguish between structural and functional conservation Yaqi Giberella zeae (PH-1)
Lysine Wasan Abada Madhavi Patel Jing Huang Shafa Chaudry   Predict membrane topology Ryder Kluyveromyces lactis (NRRL Y-1140)
Leucine Wei Tang Rui Chen YinYing Zhang Miao Yu   Predict membrane topology Ryder Magnaporthe grisea (70-15)
Methionine               Neurospora crassa (OR74-A)
Asparagine Devin Trudeau Julia Li Jiayi Hu Alex Ling   Identify whether a gene of interest has been under recent positive selection Yaqi Pichia stipitis (CBS 6054)
Proline Jestyn Liew Curtis Foong Maryam Foumani Jennifer D'Cruz   Distinguish between structural and functional conservation Philip Schizosaccharomyces pombe (972h-)
Glutamine Anand Iyer Kevin Lau Cecilia Chan Dilpreet Dhesi   Identify and contrast conserved regions on a gene vs. conserved regions on its expressed protein Ryder Ustilago maydis (521)
Arginine Cheng Yu Risa Yuk Low Lakshmi Sugavaneswaran Linda Zhao Zhongyuan Zhang Identify and contrast conserved regions on a gene vs. conserved regions on its expressed protein Boris Yarrowia lipolytica (CLIB122)
Serine                
Threonine                
Valine                
Tryptophan                
Tyrosine